Fakultät: |
Theologische Fakultät, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin |
Seminar: |
Interdisziplinäres Proseminar AT/NT |
Dozentin: |
Dr. Christl Maier |
Autor: |
Matthias Vogt |
Thema: |
2 Reg 25,27-30: Die Begnadigung Jojachins |
2 REG 25,27-30 Abstract
The last four verses in the books of kings report about the fate of Jehoiachin, the last (but one) king of Judah, in Babylonian exile. V. 27f. and V. 3
0 %l,M,h; taeme AL-hn"T.nI Atx'rua]w: contain a historic resemblance. Accordingly Jehoiachin was invited in the thirty-seventh year of his deportation by Amel-Marduk. The king of Babel, being enthroned just a short time before, assured Jehoiachin his alliance; this was expressed by the allocation of a throne, which - if V. 28bb is not a secondary addition - meant an equalization respect to the other vassal-kings. Most probably the assurance to provide Jehoiachin regularly with food (cf. V. 30*) - something, which Nebukadnecor II. himself had done already - was part of this friendship. It is impossible to date these events precisely; but maybe Amel-Marduk decided to take this step only a short time after his enthronisation. Accordingly Jehoiachins reprieve - the term indicates, that the kings changed status owes to Amel-Marduks merciful care - falls in spring 561 B. C. The described primary text of 2 Reg 25,27-30 could be written a short time later and still in Babylonia. It is possible that the authors used a written definition of the friendship - a kind of treaty - or annals, which gave information about the events. The exact date V. 28 and the unusual vocabulary, which is influenced by the Akkadic or Neo-Babylonic, indicate this. Possibly the report about Jehoiachins reprieve was conceived as an addition to the books of kings right from the beginning (cf. V. 28 and 2 Reg 25,6b). But the intention of the authors was simply to show that better times began or would begin in Babylonian Golah. The events concerning Jehoiachin are not a reflection of a turning back to Jahweh and his renewed care but of the merciful care of a Babylonian king.The report about Jehoiachins reprieve was enlarged - possibly in two steps. The redactional additions V. 29, V. 30
dymiT' tx;rua] and wY"x; ymey> lKo AmAyB. ~Ay-rb;D> and probably V. 28bb want to emphasize the events concerning the king of Judah by embellishing them and underlining the permanence of Jehoiachins changed fate. The redactors work, which could has been connected with a beginning canonization of the Deuteronomistic History, gives the books of kings a hopefully to the future looking ending. At least the second redaction took place in Judah therefore it dates most likely in the fifth century B. C.The position of 2 Reg 25,27-30 lends the episode about Jehoiachins reprieve a great importance. Nevertheless it is reported just in a few words. The redactors restrict their additions, too. There is no sense of hope in a restitution of the Davidic kingdom at all. The final chapters of the books of kings (2 Reg 24f.) contain a different message. With restraint they indicate that - for the moment - a continuation of Israels history is not to expect of Judah itself. 2 Reg 25,27-30 underlines finally, that there is nothing to fear of the former enemy. After thirty years in exile there had been a normalization of the relationship, which even led to a friendship between the king of Babel and Jehoiachin, the former king of Judah.